(42 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
<center><font size="4"></font>  
+
<center>
 
<font size="4">Downsampling </font>  
 
<font size="4">Downsampling </font>  
  
Line 8: Line 8:
 
</center>  
 
</center>  
 
----
 
----
 +
----
 +
<br>
  
<font size="3"></font>
+
== <font size="3"></font><font size="3"></font>Outline  ==
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>  
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>  
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
 
+
<font size="3"></font>
+
  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
Line 60: Line 38:
  
 
<font size="3">
 
<font size="3">
== Outline  ==
 
 
 
#Introduction  
 
#Introduction  
 
#Definition of Downsampling<br>  
 
#Definition of Downsampling<br>  
 
#Derivation of DTFT&nbsp;of downsampled signal<br>  
 
#Derivation of DTFT&nbsp;of downsampled signal<br>  
 
#Example  
 
#Example  
#Conclusion
+
#Decimator
#References
+
#Conclusion<br>
  
 
----
 
----
Line 73: Line 49:
 
== Introduction  ==
 
== Introduction  ==
  
This slecture provides definition of downsampling, derives DTFT&nbsp;equation of downsampled signal and demonstrates it in a frequency domain. Also, it explains process of decimation and why it needs a low-pass filter.  
+
This slecture provides definition of downsampling, derives DTFT of&nbsp; downsampled signal and demonstrates it in a frequency domain. Also, it explains process of decimation and why it needs a low-pass filter.  
  
 
----
 
----
Line 81: Line 57:
 
Downsampling is an operation which involves throwing away samples from discrete-time signal. Let&nbsp; ''x[n]'' be a digital-time signal shown below: <br>  
 
Downsampling is an operation which involves throwing away samples from discrete-time signal. Let&nbsp; ''x[n]'' be a digital-time signal shown below: <br>  
  
GRAPH<br>  
+
[[Image:Xofn.jpg]]<br>  
  
 
&nbsp;then y[n] will be produced by downsampling ''x [n]''&nbsp; by factor ''D'' = 3. So, ''y [n] = x[Dn]''.  
 
&nbsp;then y[n] will be produced by downsampling ''x [n]''&nbsp; by factor ''D'' = 3. So, ''y [n] = x[Dn]''.  
  
GRAPH<br>  
+
[[Image:Yofn.jpg]]<br>  
  
 
As seen in above graph, ''y [n]'' is obtained by throwing away some samples from x [n]. So, ''y [n]'' is a downsampled signal from  
 
As seen in above graph, ''y [n]'' is obtained by throwing away some samples from x [n]. So, ''y [n]'' is a downsampled signal from  
Line 95: Line 71:
 
== Derivation of DTFT&nbsp;of downsampled signal  ==
 
== Derivation of DTFT&nbsp;of downsampled signal  ==
  
Let ''x<sub>2</sub> [n] = x<sub>1</sub> [Dn]''.  
+
Let ''x (t) ''be a continuous tim''e ''signal. Then ''x<sub>1</sub> [n] = x (T<sub>1</sub>n) ''and''&nbsp; x<sub>2</sub> [n] = x (T<sub>2</sub>n)''. And ratio of sampling periods would be
 +
 
 +
D = T<sub>2</sub>/T<sub>1</sub>, &nbsp; which is an integer greater than 1. From these equations we obtain realtionship between ''x<sub>1</sub> [n]'' and ''x<sub>2</sub> [n]''. <br>
 +
 
 +
<math>\begin{align}
 +
x_2 [n] = x(T_2 n) = x(DT_1 n) = x_1 [nD]
 +
\end{align}</math>
  
 
Below we derive Discrete-Time Fourier Transform of ''x<sub>2</sub> [n]'' in terms of DTFT of ''x<sub>1</sub> [n]''.  
 
Below we derive Discrete-Time Fourier Transform of ''x<sub>2</sub> [n]'' in terms of DTFT of ''x<sub>1</sub> [n]''.  
Line 112: Line 94:
  
 
<math>s_D [m]=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
 
<math>s_D [m]=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1,& \text{ if } n \text{ is a multiple of } 4,\\
+
1,& \text{ if } n \text{ is a multiple of } D,\\
 
0, & \text{ else}.  
 
0, & \text{ else}.  
 
\end{array}\right. = {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}}</math>  
 
\end{array}\right. = {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}}</math>  
Line 123: Line 105:
 
&=  {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \mathcal{X}_1 ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}}) \\
 
&=  {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \mathcal{X}_1 ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}}) \\
 
\end{align}</math>  
 
\end{align}</math>  
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
== Example<br>  ==
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
 +
 +
Let's take a look&nbsp; at&nbsp; an original signal ''X<sub>1</sub> (w)'' and&nbsp;&nbsp;''X<sub>2</sub> (w)'' which is obtained after downsampling X<sub>1</sub>(w) by factor D = 2 in a frequency domain.
 +
 +
[[Image:Downsamplegraph.jpg]]<br>
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
 +
 +
From two graphs it is seen that signal is stretched by D&nbsp; in frequency domain and&nbsp; decreased by D in a magnitude after downsampling. Both signals have the frequency of&nbsp;<math>\begin{align}
 +
2\pi
 +
\end{align}</math> .
 +
 +
== Decimator  ==
 +
 +
As seen in second graph, if&nbsp;<math>\begin{align}
 +
D2\pi T_1f_{max}
 +
\end{align}</math> is greater than <math>\begin{align}
 +
\pi
 +
\end{align}</math> aliasing occurs. Downsampler is a part of a decimator which also has a low-pass filter to&nbsp; prevent aliasing.&nbsp; LPF eliminates signal components which has&nbsp; frequencies higher than cutoff frequency, which can be found from graphs shown above.<br>
 +
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <math>\begin{align}
 +
& D\omega_c = D 2 \pi T_1 f_{max} < \pi\\
 +
& {\frac{T_2}{T_1}} 2\pi T_1 f_{max} < \pi \\
 +
&  2\pi T_2f_{max} < \pi \\
 +
&f_{max} < {\frac{1}{2T_2}}
 +
\end{align}</math>
 +
 +
Thereby, signal needs to be filtered before downsampling if f<sub>max</sub> &gt; 1/(2T<sub>2</sub>) . Complete block diagram of a decimator is shown below:<br>
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
 +
 +
[[Image:Decimator cutoff.jpg]]
  
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
Line 134: Line 147:
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
  
[[Image:X1.png]]
+
----
  
We would like to determine what <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> looks like in order to find a way to reconstruct <span class="texhtml">''x''(''t'')</span>.
+
== Conclusion  ==
 +
</font>
  
Since we have sampled at a rate <span class="texhtml">''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &gt; 2''f''<sub>''M''</sub></span>, the following inequalities hold:
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
<math> f_s > 2f_M \iff f_s - f_M > f_M \iff -f_s + f_M < f_M </math>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
Together, these inequalities, the graph of <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span>, and the expression for <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> in terms of <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> imply that <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> will have the spectrum shown in the figure below.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
[[Image:Xs1.png]]
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
Notice that the spectrum of the ideal sampling of a signal is an amplitude scaled periodic repetition of the original spectrum. Since <span class="texhtml">''x''(''t'')</span> is bandlimited and we have sampled at a rate <span class="texhtml">''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &gt; 2''f''<sub>''M''</sub></span>, the periodic repetitions of <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> do not overlap.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
All the information needed to reconstruct <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> can be found in the portion of <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> that corresponds to <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> (shown in red). Therefore we can use a simple lowpass filter with gain <math> \tfrac{1}{f_s} </math> and cutoff frequency <math> \tfrac{f_s}{2} </math> to recover <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> from <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
<br> <math>
+
<font size="3"></font>  
X(f) = X_s(f)\left\{
+
\begin{array}{ll}
+
\frac{1}{f_s}, & |f| \le \frac{f_s}{2}\\
+
0, & \text{else}
+
\end{array}
+
\right. </math>  
+
  
<math> \iff x(t) = x_s(t)*\text{sinc}(f_st) </math>  
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
<math> \therefore </math> We can perfectly reconstruct <span class="texhtml">''x''(''t'')</span> from <span class="texhtml">''x''<sub>''s''</sub>(''t'')</span>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
----
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
== Example  ==
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
Though the Nyquist theorem states that perfect reconstruction is possible if we satisfy the Nyquist condition <span class="texhtml">(''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &gt; 2''f''<sub>''M''</sub>)</span>, it is important to note that this condition is not necessary. The following example demonstrates how perfect reconstruction is sometimes possible even when undersampling.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
Let the signal <span class="texhtml">''x''(''t'')</span> have a spectrum <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> as seen in the figure below.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
[[Image:X2.png]]
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
The Nyquist condition states that we should sample at a rate <span class="texhtml">''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &gt; 2(2''a'') = 4''a''</span>. Instead, let us sample at <span class="texhtml">''f''<sub>''s''</sub> = 2''a''</span>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
As before, we have <math> x_s(t) = x(t)p_{\frac{1}{f_s}}(t) </math> and <math> X_s(f) = f_s\sum_{k = -\infty}^\infty X(f-kf_s) </math>  
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
<math> \implies X_s(f) = 2a\sum_{k = -\infty}^\infty X(f-2ka) </math>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
Therefore, <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> will have the spectrum shown in the figure below.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
[[Image:Xs2.png]]
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
Notice that there is no aliasing in <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> even though <span class="texhtml">''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &lt; 4''a''</span>. In addition, the portion of <span class="texhtml">''X''<sub>''s''</sub>(''f'')</span> that corresponds to <span class="texhtml">''X''(''f'')</span> (shown in red) can be recovered using a bandpass filter with gain <math> \tfrac{1}{2a} </math> and cutoff frequencies <span class="texhtml">''a'' and 2''a''</span>.
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
----
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
== Conclusion  ==
+
<font size="3"></font>  
</font>
+
  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
Line 235: Line 242:
 
<font size="3"></font>  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
  
<font size="3">To summarize, the Nyquist theorem states that any bandlimited signal can be perfectly reconstructed from its sampling if sampled at a rate greater than twice its bandwidth <span class="texhtml">(''f''<sub>''s''</sub> &gt; 2''f''<sub>''M''</sub>)</span>. However, the Nyquist condition is not necessary for perfect reconstruction as shown in the example above. </font>  
+
<font size="3"></font>  
  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
 
<font size="3"></font>  
  
----
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
== References  ==
+
<font size="3"></font>
  
[1] John G. Proakis, Dimitris G. Manolakis, "Digital Signal Processing with Principles, Algorithms, and Applications" 4th Edition,2006
+
<font size="3"></font>
 +
 
 +
<font size="3">To summarize, downsampling is a process of removing samples from signal. After downsampling,&nbsp; signal decreases by factor D in the magnitude and stretches by D in frequency domain.&nbsp; In order to downsample a signal, it first should be filtered by LPF to prevent aliasing.&nbsp; Both LPF and downsampler are parts of a decimator. </font>
 +
 
 +
<font size="3"></font>
  
 
----
 
----
 +
 +
<br>
  
 
----
 
----
Line 251: Line 264:
 
----
 
----
  
== [[Nyquist Miguel Castellanos ECE438 slecture review|Questions and comments]]  ==
+
----
  
If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on [[Nyquist Miguel Castellanos ECE438 slecture review|this page]].
+
== [[Yeshmukhanbetov ECE438 slecture review|Questions and comments]] ==
  
----
+
If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on [[Yeshmukhanbetov ECE438 slecture review|this page]].
  
[[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]]  
+
----
 +
[[2014_Fall_ECE_438_Boutin_digital_signal_processing_slectures|Back to ECE438 slectures, Fall 2014]]
  
 
[[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]]
 
[[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]]

Latest revision as of 18:07, 16 March 2015


Downsampling

A slecture by ECE student Yerkebulan Yeshmukhanbetov

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.




Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Definition of Downsampling
  3. Derivation of DTFT of downsampled signal
  4. Example
  5. Decimator
  6. Conclusion

Introduction

This slecture provides definition of downsampling, derives DTFT of  downsampled signal and demonstrates it in a frequency domain. Also, it explains process of decimation and why it needs a low-pass filter.


Definition of Downsampling

Downsampling is an operation which involves throwing away samples from discrete-time signal. Let  x[n] be a digital-time signal shown below:

Xofn.jpg

 then y[n] will be produced by downsampling x [n]  by factor D = 3. So, y [n] = x[Dn].

Yofn.jpg

As seen in above graph, y [n] is obtained by throwing away some samples from x [n]. So, y [n] is a downsampled signal from

x [n].


Derivation of DTFT of downsampled signal

Let x (t) be a continuous time signal. Then x1 [n] = x (T1n) and  x2 [n] = x (T2n). And ratio of sampling periods would be

D = T2/T1,   which is an integer greater than 1. From these equations we obtain realtionship between x1 [n] and x2 [n].

$ \begin{align} x_2 [n] = x(T_2 n) = x(DT_1 n) = x_1 [nD] \end{align} $

Below we derive Discrete-Time Fourier Transform of x2 [n] in terms of DTFT of x1 [n].


$ \begin{align} &\mathcal{X}_2(\omega)= \mathcal{F}(x_2 [n]) = \mathcal{F}(x_1 [Dn])\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x_1[Dn] e^{-j \omega n} = \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty x_1[m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty s_D[m]* x_1 [m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ \end{align} $


where

$ s_D [m]=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1,& \text{ if } n \text{ is a multiple of } D,\\ 0, & \text{ else}. \end{array}\right. = {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}} $


$ \begin{align} &\mathcal{X}_2(\omega)= \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} e^{jk {\frac{2 \pi}{D} m}} x_1[m] e^{-j \omega {\frac{m}{D}}}\\ &= {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \sum_{m = -\infty}^\infty x_1[m] e^{-jm ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}})} = \\ &= {\frac{1}{D}} \sum_{k = -\infty}^{D-1} \mathcal{X}_1 ({\frac{\omega - 2 \pi k}{D}}) \\ \end{align} $


Example


Let's take a look  at  an original signal X1 (w) and  X2 (w) which is obtained after downsampling X1(w) by factor D = 2 in a frequency domain.

Downsamplegraph.jpg


From two graphs it is seen that signal is stretched by D  in frequency domain and  decreased by D in a magnitude after downsampling. Both signals have the frequency of $ \begin{align} 2\pi \end{align} $ .

Decimator

As seen in second graph, if $ \begin{align} D2\pi T_1f_{max} \end{align} $ is greater than $ \begin{align} \pi \end{align} $ aliasing occurs. Downsampler is a part of a decimator which also has a low-pass filter to  prevent aliasing.  LPF eliminates signal components which has  frequencies higher than cutoff frequency, which can be found from graphs shown above.

                             $ \begin{align} & D\omega_c = D 2 \pi T_1 f_{max} < \pi\\ & {\frac{T_2}{T_1}} 2\pi T_1 f_{max} < \pi \\ & 2\pi T_2f_{max} < \pi \\ &f_{max} < {\frac{1}{2T_2}} \end{align} $

Thereby, signal needs to be filtered before downsampling if fmax > 1/(2T2) . Complete block diagram of a decimator is shown below:


Decimator cutoff.jpg




Conclusion

To summarize, downsampling is a process of removing samples from signal. After downsampling,  signal decreases by factor D in the magnitude and stretches by D in frequency domain.  In order to downsample a signal, it first should be filtered by LPF to prevent aliasing.  Both LPF and downsampler are parts of a decimator.






Questions and comments

If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page.


Back to ECE438 slectures, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett