Line 12: Line 12:
 
</center>  
 
</center>  
 
----
 
----
=HonorsContractECE438CBP=
+
=Introduction=
 +
Convolution Back Projection (CBP) offers a reconstruction method that is not computationally expensive. Although the method is based on the Fourier Slice Theorem, there's never a transformation to the frequency domain. Theoretically CBP involves extruding every projection back through the origin and then summing the results. This operation is called back projection. The projections in Figure 1 were all assumed to be the same regardless of <math>\theta</math>.  In Figure 1a, the extrusion is demonstrated. In Figure 1b, the summing is demonstrated.
  
 +
[[Image:something.jpg|400px|thumb|....]]
  
 +
----
 +
=Summary=
 +
There are 3 steps to reconstructing an object from its projections using CBP. <br />
 +
1. Measure the projections <math>p_{\theta}(r)</math>. (i.e. using CT)<br />
 +
2. Filter the projections <math>g_{\theta}(r) = h(r) * p_{\theta}(r)</math><br />
 +
3. Back project filtered projections
 +
<math>f(x,y) = \int_0^{\pi}g_{\theta}(x\cos(\theta)+x\sin(\theta))d\theta</math><br />
  
Put your content here . . .
+
An infinite number of filtered back projections will result in a perfect reconstruction of the original image of the object given it is band limited. Since it is impossible to take that many projections, a good practice is to take at least <math>n</math> back projections for a <math>n</math> by <math>n</math> image.
  
 +
----
 +
=Derivation=
 +
 +
From the Fourier Slice Theorem, we get the following relationships.<br />
 +
<math>\begin{aligh}
 +
u &= \rho\cos(\theta) \\
 +
v &= \rho\sin(\theta)
 +
\end{align}</math> <br />
 +
 +
Now let's calculate the Jacobian of the polar coordinate transformation.<br />
 +
 +
<math>dudv = \left | \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (\theta,\rho)} \right \vert d\theta d\rho</math>
 +
<br />
 +
<math>\begin{align}
 +
\left | \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (\theta,\rho)} \right \vert
 +
&= det\begin{bmatrix}
 +
\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho} \\
 +
\frac{\partial v}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho}
 +
\end{bmatrix} \\
 +
&= det\begin{bmatrix}
 +
\frac{\partial (\rho\cos(\theta))}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial (\rho\cos(\theta))}{\partial \rho} \\
 +
\frac{\partial (\rho\sin(\theta))}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial (\rho\sin(\theta))}{\partial \rho}
 +
\end{bmatrix} \\
 +
&= det\begin{bmatrix}
 +
-\rho\sin(\theta) & \cos(\theta) \\
 +
\rho\cos(\theta) & \sin(\theta)
 +
\end{bmatrix} \\
 +
&= |-\rho\sin^{2}(\theta) - \rho\cos^{2}(\theta)| \\
 +
&= |-\rho(\sin^{2}(\theta) + \cos^{2}(\theta))| \\
 +
&= |-\rho| \\
 +
&= |\rho| \\
 +
\end{align}</math><br />
 +
<math>\Rightarrow dudv = |\rho|d\theta d\rho</math><br />
 +
Starting with the formula for the inverse CSFT and using the Fourier Slice theorem, we will end up with<br />
 +
<math>\begin{align}
 +
f(x,y) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(u,v)e^{2\pi j(xu+yv)}dudv \\
 +
&= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\pi}F(\rho\cos(\theta),\rho\sin(\theta))e^{2\pi j(x\rho\cos(\theta) +y\rho\sin(\theta))}|\rho|d\theta d\rho \\
 +
&= \int_0^{\pi}\underbrace{[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|\rho|P_{\theta}e^{2\pi j\rho(x\cos(\theta) +y\sin(\theta))}d\rho]}_{g_{\theta}(x\cos(\theta) + y\sin(\theta))}d\theta
 +
\end{align}
 +
</math><br />
 +
Pulling out <math>g_{\theta}(t)</math>,<br />
 +
<math>\begin{align}
 +
g_{\theta}(t) &= \int_{\infty}^{\infty}|\rho|P_{\theta}(\rho)e^{2\pi j\rho t}d\rho \\
 +
&= CTFT^{-1}\{|\rho|P_{\theta}(\rho)\} ", by comparison with the inverse CTFT"\\
 +
&= h(t) * p_{\theta}(r)
 +
\end{align}</math>
 +
 +
=Projection Filter Analysis=
 +
Now let's focus on <math>g_{\theta}(r)</math>.
 +
<math>g_{\theta}(r) = h(r) * p_{\theta}(r)</math><br />
 +
The frequency response of the filter is
 +
<math>H(\rho) = CTFT{h(r)} = |\rho|</math><br />
 +
After graphing the frequency response, it is apparent that the filter is a high pass filter. <br />
 +
 +
[[Image: ;asdjf;alsdf]]
 +
 +
This filter can be represented by a rect minus a triangle wave, so
 +
=Back Projection Analysis=
  
  

Revision as of 13:03, 21 December 2014

Link title

Convolution/Fourier Back Projection Algorithm

A slecture by ECE student Sahil Sanghani

Partly based on the ECE 637 material of Professor Bouman.


Introduction

Convolution Back Projection (CBP) offers a reconstruction method that is not computationally expensive. Although the method is based on the Fourier Slice Theorem, there's never a transformation to the frequency domain. Theoretically CBP involves extruding every projection back through the origin and then summing the results. This operation is called back projection. The projections in Figure 1 were all assumed to be the same regardless of $ \theta $. In Figure 1a, the extrusion is demonstrated. In Figure 1b, the summing is demonstrated.


Summary

There are 3 steps to reconstructing an object from its projections using CBP.
1. Measure the projections $ p_{\theta}(r) $. (i.e. using CT)
2. Filter the projections $ g_{\theta}(r) = h(r) * p_{\theta}(r) $
3. Back project filtered projections $ f(x,y) = \int_0^{\pi}g_{\theta}(x\cos(\theta)+x\sin(\theta))d\theta $

An infinite number of filtered back projections will result in a perfect reconstruction of the original image of the object given it is band limited. Since it is impossible to take that many projections, a good practice is to take at least $ n $ back projections for a $ n $ by $ n $ image.


Derivation

From the Fourier Slice Theorem, we get the following relationships.
$ \begin{aligh} u &= \rho\cos(\theta) \\ v &= \rho\sin(\theta) \end{align} $

Now let's calculate the Jacobian of the polar coordinate transformation.

$ dudv = \left | \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (\theta,\rho)} \right \vert d\theta d\rho $
$ \begin{align} \left | \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (\theta,\rho)} \right \vert &= det\begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho} \\ \frac{\partial v}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial u}{\partial \rho} \end{bmatrix} \\ &= det\begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial (\rho\cos(\theta))}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial (\rho\cos(\theta))}{\partial \rho} \\ \frac{\partial (\rho\sin(\theta))}{\partial \theta} & \frac{\partial (\rho\sin(\theta))}{\partial \rho} \end{bmatrix} \\ &= det\begin{bmatrix} -\rho\sin(\theta) & \cos(\theta) \\ \rho\cos(\theta) & \sin(\theta) \end{bmatrix} \\ &= |-\rho\sin^{2}(\theta) - \rho\cos^{2}(\theta)| \\ &= |-\rho(\sin^{2}(\theta) + \cos^{2}(\theta))| \\ &= |-\rho| \\ &= |\rho| \\ \end{align} $
$ \Rightarrow dudv = |\rho|d\theta d\rho $
Starting with the formula for the inverse CSFT and using the Fourier Slice theorem, we will end up with
$ \begin{align} f(x,y) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}F(u,v)e^{2\pi j(xu+yv)}dudv \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{\pi}F(\rho\cos(\theta),\rho\sin(\theta))e^{2\pi j(x\rho\cos(\theta) +y\rho\sin(\theta))}|\rho|d\theta d\rho \\ &= \int_0^{\pi}\underbrace{[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|\rho|P_{\theta}e^{2\pi j\rho(x\cos(\theta) +y\sin(\theta))}d\rho]}_{g_{\theta}(x\cos(\theta) + y\sin(\theta))}d\theta \end{align} $
Pulling out $ g_{\theta}(t) $,
$ \begin{align} g_{\theta}(t) &= \int_{\infty}^{\infty}|\rho|P_{\theta}(\rho)e^{2\pi j\rho t}d\rho \\ &= CTFT^{-1}\{|\rho|P_{\theta}(\rho)\} ", by comparison with the inverse CTFT"\\ &= h(t) * p_{\theta}(r) \end{align} $

Projection Filter Analysis

Now let's focus on $ g_{\theta}(r) $. $ g_{\theta}(r) = h(r) * p_{\theta}(r) $
The frequency response of the filter is $ H(\rho) = CTFT{h(r)} = |\rho| $
After graphing the frequency response, it is apparent that the filter is a high pass filter.

File:;asdjf;alsdf

This filter can be represented by a rect minus a triangle wave, so

Back Projection Analysis


References:
[1] C. A. Bouman. ECE 637. Class Lecture. Digital Image Processing I. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University. Spring 2013.

Back to Honors Contract Main Page

Alumni Liaison

To all math majors: "Mathematics is a wonderfully rich subject."

Dr. Paul Garrett