m (Protected "Nyquist Theorem Stein slecture ECE438 review" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:slecture]]
+
<br>
[[Category:review]]
+
<center><font size="4"></font>
[[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]]
+
<font size="4">Questions and Comments for </font> <font size="4">[[Slecture Nyquist Theorem Stein|Nyquist Theorem]] </font>
[[Category:ECE]]
+
[[Category:ECE438]]
+
[[Category:signal processing]]
+
  
<center><font size= 4>
+
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Robert Stein
Questions and Comments for
+
</center>  
 +
----
  
[[Slecture_Nyquist_Theorem_Stein  | Nyquist Theorem]]
+
----
</font size>
+
  
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Robert Stein
+
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.  
  
</center>
 
 
----
 
----
 +
 
----
 
----
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
+
*Review by Miguel Castellanos
 +
 
 +
You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem.
 +
 
 
----
 
----
 +
*Review by Yijun Han
 +
 +
Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies.
 +
 
----
 
----
* Review by student 1 
+
*Review by Soonho Kwon
**Author answer here
+
 
 +
It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job!
 +
 
 
----
 
----
* Review by student 2 
+
*Review by Hyungsuk Kim
**Author answer here
+
 
 +
It is good to see the well drawn graphs however it would be better if you put some formulas and explanations about those two graphs. And it would be more understandable if you put some examples.<br>
 +
 
 
----
 
----
* Review by student 3 
+
*Review by Yerkebulan Y
**Author answer here
+
 
 +
Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked.
 +
 
 
----
 
----
* Review by student 4 
+
*Review by Fabian Faes
**Author answer here
+
 
 +
I do agree with everybody else that this is a clear and concise explanation, however for my liking I would have preferred more explanations and more detailed graph. The math listed and the graphs shown did however express a clear and logical idea. Overall a simple and straightforward slecture.
 +
 
 
----
 
----
[[2014_Fall_ECE_438_Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]]
+
*Review by Randall Cochran
 +
 
 +
The structure of the slecture was nice, and the graphs were easy to see and understand. As others have said, I would have liked to have seen an example showing the Nyquist condition not being met, and what the results of that would be.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
*Review by Michel Olvera
 +
 
 +
This Slecture summarizes in a short but concise way what we need to know about the Nyquist Theorem. More details and examples when Nyquist condition is not satisfied would be nice to add to your Slecture. Great job!
 +
 
 +
----
 +
*Review by Evan Stockrahm
 +
 
 +
This is quite a brief slecture. While I don't disagree with any information on the page, I think it could use a bit more explanation. For example, what is Xs(t). Let us know that X(f) is just an arbitrary plot.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
*Review by student 10
 +
 
 +
Author Answers here
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:Review]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]]

Latest revision as of 04:40, 15 October 2014


Questions and Comments for Nyquist Theorem

A slecture by ECE student Robert Stein



Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.



  • Review by Miguel Castellanos

You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem.


  • Review by Yijun Han

Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies.


  • Review by Soonho Kwon

It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job!


  • Review by Hyungsuk Kim

It is good to see the well drawn graphs however it would be better if you put some formulas and explanations about those two graphs. And it would be more understandable if you put some examples.


  • Review by Yerkebulan Y

Clear, simple, concise. Nyquist theorem is proved, which was the only thing that was asked.


  • Review by Fabian Faes

I do agree with everybody else that this is a clear and concise explanation, however for my liking I would have preferred more explanations and more detailed graph. The math listed and the graphs shown did however express a clear and logical idea. Overall a simple and straightforward slecture.


  • Review by Randall Cochran

The structure of the slecture was nice, and the graphs were easy to see and understand. As others have said, I would have liked to have seen an example showing the Nyquist condition not being met, and what the results of that would be.


  • Review by Michel Olvera

This Slecture summarizes in a short but concise way what we need to know about the Nyquist Theorem. More details and examples when Nyquist condition is not satisfied would be nice to add to your Slecture. Great job!


  • Review by Evan Stockrahm

This is quite a brief slecture. While I don't disagree with any information on the page, I think it could use a bit more explanation. For example, what is Xs(t). Let us know that X(f) is just an arbitrary plot.


  • Review by student 10

Author Answers here




Back to ECE438, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood