m (Protected "Nyquist Miguel Castellanos ECE438 slecture review" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:slecture]]
+
<br>
[[Category:review]]
+
<center><font size="4">
[[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]]
+
[[Category:ECE]]
+
[[Category:ECE438]]
+
[[Category:signal processing]] 
+
 
+
<center><font size= 4>
+
 
Questions and Comments for
 
Questions and Comments for
 +
</font>
 +
<font size="4">[[Nyquist Miguel Castellanos ECE438 slecture|Nyquist Theorem]] </font>
  
[[Nyquist_Miguel_Castellanos_ECE438_slecture| Nyquist Theorem]]
+
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Miguel Rodrigo Castellanos
</font size>
+
</center>  
 +
----
  
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Miguel Rodrigo Castellanos
+
----
 +
 
 +
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.  
  
</center>
 
 
----
 
----
 +
 
----
 
----
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
+
 
 +
*Review by Yerkebulan Y.
 +
 
 +
Very clear explanation of Nyquist Theorem in words, which is also supported with graphs. Also,I need to mention exception that you provided. I am not sure if signal can have such FT.  
 +
 
 
----
 
----
 +
 +
*Review by Fabian Faes
 +
 +
I enjoyed the mathematical steps that were taken to show how the Nyquist Theorem upholds when performing reconstruction, however I do believe that more graphs would have been beneficial in the understanding. The fact that there is a strong conclusion which states how reconstruction is sometimes possible even though the Nyquist condition is not met is an important message to be closed on. Overall it is a good slecture!
 +
 
----
 
----
* Review by student
+
 
 +
*Review by Michael Hayashi
 +
 
 +
I enjoyed the presentation of the Nyquist Theorem in this slecture. Your proof was solid and the coloration of the center copy removed the need to have more graphs. It was a fun exercise to include the Nyquist-violating sampling example in your presentation; nothing could have done a better job explaining the sufficient, but not necessary, aspect of using the Nyquist condition for reconstruction. I applaud the thoroughness and accuracy of this slecture.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
*Review by Chloe Kauffman
 +
 
 +
This was a very helpful slecture for Nyquist. I would have liked to seen the tie between sampling at exactly above Nyquist, versus even larger of a sampling frequency for real world design application. I.e. sampling at just above Nyquist requires a nearly perfect LPF with sharp cutoff, vs. limitation of even larger Nyquist rates. Your graphs and explanations aided in the topic learning.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
*Review by Matt Miller
 +
This slecture was very clear and very well detailed. The inclusion of diagrams made it very easy to follow.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
*Review by student 6
 
**Author answer here
 
**Author answer here
 +
 
----
 
----
* Review by student
+
 
 +
*Review by student 7
 
**Author answer here
 
**Author answer here
 +
 
----
 
----
* Review by student
+
 
 +
*Review by student 8
 
**Author answer here
 
**Author answer here
 +
 
----
 
----
* Review by student
+
 
 +
*Review by student 9
 
**Author answer here
 
**Author answer here
 +
 
----
 
----
[[2014_Fall_ECE_438_Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]]
+
 
 +
*Review by student 10
 +
**Author answer here
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
[[2014 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2014]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Slecture]] [[Category:Review]] [[Category:ECE438Fall2014Boutin]] [[Category:ECE]] [[Category:ECE438]] [[Category:Signal_processing]]

Latest revision as of 04:39, 15 October 2014


Questions and Comments for Nyquist Theorem

A slecture by ECE student Miguel Rodrigo Castellanos



Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.



  • Review by Yerkebulan Y.

Very clear explanation of Nyquist Theorem in words, which is also supported with graphs. Also,I need to mention exception that you provided. I am not sure if signal can have such FT.


  • Review by Fabian Faes

I enjoyed the mathematical steps that were taken to show how the Nyquist Theorem upholds when performing reconstruction, however I do believe that more graphs would have been beneficial in the understanding. The fact that there is a strong conclusion which states how reconstruction is sometimes possible even though the Nyquist condition is not met is an important message to be closed on. Overall it is a good slecture!


  • Review by Michael Hayashi

I enjoyed the presentation of the Nyquist Theorem in this slecture. Your proof was solid and the coloration of the center copy removed the need to have more graphs. It was a fun exercise to include the Nyquist-violating sampling example in your presentation; nothing could have done a better job explaining the sufficient, but not necessary, aspect of using the Nyquist condition for reconstruction. I applaud the thoroughness and accuracy of this slecture.


  • Review by Chloe Kauffman

This was a very helpful slecture for Nyquist. I would have liked to seen the tie between sampling at exactly above Nyquist, versus even larger of a sampling frequency for real world design application. I.e. sampling at just above Nyquist requires a nearly perfect LPF with sharp cutoff, vs. limitation of even larger Nyquist rates. Your graphs and explanations aided in the topic learning.


  • Review by Matt Miller

This slecture was very clear and very well detailed. The inclusion of diagrams made it very easy to follow.


  • Review by student 6
    • Author answer here

  • Review by student 7
    • Author answer here

  • Review by student 8
    • Author answer here

  • Review by student 9
    • Author answer here

  • Review by student 10
    • Author answer here

Back to ECE438, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn