Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Let's take the Transformation: | Let's take the Transformation: | ||
− | <font size=4><math>T(u,v) = <u * \cos v, | + | <font size=4><math>T(u,v) = <u*\cos v,u*\sin v> </math> </font>. |
What would be the Jacobian Matrix of this Transformation? | What would be the Jacobian Matrix of this Transformation? |
Revision as of 09:35, 8 May 2013
Contents
Jacobians and their applications
by Joseph Ruan
Basic Definition
The Jacobian Matrix is just a matrix that takes the partial derivatives of each element of a transformation. In general, the Jacobian Matrix of a transformation F, looks like this:
F1,F2, F3... are each of the elements of the output vector and x1,x2, x3 ... are each of the elements of the input vector.
So for example, in a 2 dimensional case, let T be a transformation such that T(u,v)=<x,y> then the Jacobian matrix of this function would look like this:
$ J(u,v)=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} \end{bmatrix} $
To help illustrate making Jacobian matrices, let's do some examples:
Example #1:
Let's take the Transformation:
$ T(u,v) = <u*\cos v,u*\sin v> $ .
What would be the Jacobian Matrix of this Transformation?
Solution:
$ x=u*\cos v \longrightarrow \frac{\partial x}{\partial u}= \cos v , \; \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} = -u*\sin v $
$ y=u*\sin v \longrightarrow \frac{\partial y}{\partial u}= \sin v , \; \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} = u*\cos v $
Therefore the Jacobian matrix is
$ \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} \cos v & -u*\sin v \\ \sin v & u*\cos v \end{bmatrix} $
This example actually showcased the transformation "T" as the change from polar coordinates into Cartesian coordinates.
Example #2:
Let's take the Transformation:
$ T(u,v) = <u, v, u+v> $ .
What would be the Jacobian Matrix of this Transformation?
Solution:
Notice, that this matrix will not be square because there is a difference in dimensions of the input and output, i.e. the transformation is not injective.
$ x=u \longrightarrow \frac{\partial x}{\partial u}= 1 , \; \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} = 0 $
$ y=v \longrightarrow \frac{\partial y}{\partial u}=0 , \; \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} = 1 $
$ z=u+v \longrightarrow \frac{\partial y}{\partial u}= 1 , \; \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} = 1 $
Therefore the Jacobian matrix is
$ \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial v} \\ \frac{\partial z}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial z}{\partial v} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1\end{bmatrix} $
Example #3:
Let's take the Transformation:
$ T(u,v) = <uv> $ .
What would be the Jacobian Matrix of this Transformation?
Solution:
Notice, that this matrix will not be square because there is a difference in dimensions of the input and output, i.e. the transformation is not injective.
$ x=u \longrightarrow \frac{\partial x}{\partial u}= v , \; \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} = u $
Therefore the Jacobian matrix is
$ \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial v} \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} v & u \end{bmatrix} $
Application: Jacaobian Determinants
The determinant of Example #1 gives:
$ \left|\begin{matrix} \cos v & -u * \sin v \\ \sin v & u * \cos v \end{matrix}\right|=~~ u \cos^2 v + u \sin^2 v =~~ u $
Notice that, in an integral when changing from cartesian coordinates (dxdy) to polar coordinates $ (drd\theta) $, the equation is as such:
$ dxdy=r*drd\theta $
in this case, since $ u =r $ and $ v = \theta $, then
$ dxdy=u*dudv $
It is easy to extrapolate, then, that the transformation from one set of coordinates to another set is merely
$ dC1=det(J(T))dC2 $
where C1 is the first set of coordinates, det(J(C1)) is the determinant of the Jacobian matrix made from the Transformation T, T is the Transformation from C1 to C2 and C2 is the second set of coordinates.
It is important to notice several aspects: first, the determinant is assumed to exist and be non-zero, and therefore the Jacobian matrix must be square and invertible. This makes sense because
Sources:
- [[1]]