(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:problem solving]]
 +
[[Category:MA453]]
 +
[[Category:math]]
 +
[[Category:algebra]]
 +
 +
 +
=[[HW7_MA453Fall2008walther|HW7]] (Chapter 13, Problem 10) [[MA453]], Fall 2008, [[user:walther|Prof. Walther]]=
 +
----
 +
 
I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation".  Is that what they want?
 
I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation".  Is that what they want?
  
Line 14: Line 23:
  
 
Well, we know that -3 mod 7 = 4. So we ask what elements in <math>Z_7</math> square to get 4. 2^2 = 4. 5^2 = 25 = 4. So sqrt(-3) corresponds to 2 and 5.
 
Well, we know that -3 mod 7 = 4. So we ask what elements in <math>Z_7</math> square to get 4. 2^2 = 4. 5^2 = 25 = 4. So sqrt(-3) corresponds to 2 and 5.
 +
 +
----
 +
Interesting.  I did the same thing, but quit early with sqrt(-3) = 2.  Didn't try 5.
 +
----
 +
[[HW7_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to HW7]]
 +
 +
[[Main_Page_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to MA453 Fall 2008]]

Latest revision as of 09:53, 21 March 2013


HW7 (Chapter 13, Problem 10) MA453, Fall 2008, Prof. Walther


I used the examples on page 249 to "give a reasonable interpretation". Is that what they want?


I think what they want is something like this...

1/2 should be the multiplicative inverse of 2. In mod 7, the mult. inverse of 2 is 4 (4*2 = 2*4 = 8 mod 7 = 1). So 1/2 mod 7 could be interpreted as 4. Similar logic for the others.


I understand what you're saying for 1/2. It makes sense. But how does that follow for numbers like sqrt(-3)?


Well, we know that -3 mod 7 = 4. So we ask what elements in $ Z_7 $ square to get 4. 2^2 = 4. 5^2 = 25 = 4. So sqrt(-3) corresponds to 2 and 5.


Interesting. I did the same thing, but quit early with sqrt(-3) = 2. Didn't try 5.


Back to HW7

Back to MA453 Fall 2008

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. 2007, working on developing cool imaging technologies for digital cameras, camera phones, and video surveillance cameras.

Buyue Zhang