(Question about 1.7)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
=Homework 1, [[ECE302]], Spring 2013, [[user:mboutin|Prof. Boutin]]=
 
=Homework 1, [[ECE302]], Spring 2013, [[user:mboutin|Prof. Boutin]]=
Due Monday January 14, 2014 (in class)
+
Due Monday January 14, 2013 (in class)
 
----
 
----
 
Solve the following problems in the textbook. Hand in a hard copy of your solutions in class. Make sure to include a title page and to staple all the pages together. Write legibly and clearly. Put the problems in order. Do not write on the back of the pages. Do not use paper torn out of a spiral book. Thank you very much.   
 
Solve the following problems in the textbook. Hand in a hard copy of your solutions in class. Make sure to include a title page and to staple all the pages together. Write legibly and clearly. Put the problems in order. Do not write on the back of the pages. Do not use paper torn out of a spiral book. Thank you very much.   
Line 26: Line 26:
 
=Questions/comments/Discussion==
 
=Questions/comments/Discussion==
 
*for the proof in 1.7, can we use the probability axioms we learnt in class, even though those axioms were for probabilities(i.e. P[{A}]) and this problem is asking about relative frequencies (i.e. fA(n))? -awillats
 
*for the proof in 1.7, can we use the probability axioms we learnt in class, even though those axioms were for probabilities(i.e. P[{A}]) and this problem is asking about relative frequencies (i.e. fA(n))? -awillats
 +
**Frequencies and probabilities can be treated with the same laws since a probability is defined as the relative frequency of an outcome/event as the number of experiments approaches infiniti (eqn 1.6, pg 9).  Also, if you examine the 'three basic properties of relative frequency' (eqns 1.3/1.4/1.5, pg 7), you'll notice that they are essentially identical to the three 'Axioms of Probability'.
 +
***Correct. Make sure that this explanation is part of your answer. -pm 
  
**Answer here.
 
 
*Write a question here.
 
*Write a question here.
 
**answer here.
 
**answer here.
 
----
 
----
[[Hw1_ECE302S13Boutinsln|View solution]] (will be posted later)
+
[[hw1_discussion_sln_ECE302_S13_Boutin|View solution]] (will be posted later)
 
----
 
----
  
 
[[2013_Spring_ECE_302_Boutin|Back to ECE302, Spring 2013, Prof. Boutin]]
 
[[2013_Spring_ECE_302_Boutin|Back to ECE302, Spring 2013, Prof. Boutin]]

Latest revision as of 09:33, 25 January 2013


Homework 1, ECE302, Spring 2013, Prof. Boutin

Due Monday January 14, 2013 (in class)


Solve the following problems in the textbook. Hand in a hard copy of your solutions in class. Make sure to include a title page and to staple all the pages together. Write legibly and clearly. Put the problems in order. Do not write on the back of the pages. Do not use paper torn out of a spiral book. Thank you very much.

All problems are from: Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering, 3rd Edition, by Alberto Leon-Garcia, Pearson Education, Inc., 2008, ISBN 0-13-601641-3


1.6a) b),
1.7,
2.1,
2.2,
2.4,
2.12,
2.22,
2.23,
2.24,
2.28

Questions/comments/Discussion=

  • for the proof in 1.7, can we use the probability axioms we learnt in class, even though those axioms were for probabilities(i.e. P[{A}]) and this problem is asking about relative frequencies (i.e. fA(n))? -awillats
    • Frequencies and probabilities can be treated with the same laws since a probability is defined as the relative frequency of an outcome/event as the number of experiments approaches infiniti (eqn 1.6, pg 9). Also, if you examine the 'three basic properties of relative frequency' (eqns 1.3/1.4/1.5, pg 7), you'll notice that they are essentially identical to the three 'Axioms of Probability'.
      • Correct. Make sure that this explanation is part of your answer. -pm
  • Write a question here.
    • answer here.

View solution (will be posted later)


Back to ECE302, Spring 2013, Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood