Latest revision as of 13:20, 22 March 2011

Discussion for HW8, ECE301 Spring 2011, Prof. Boutin

For number 3, is the point distribution supposed to be 10 points each for parts a b and c? And how should it be distributed for question 5?

Oops, I forgot there was part c) in Question 3. Please give 15 points for part c). I made the correction on the homework page. I am not sure what is unclear about Question 5: can you be more precise? -pm

It says for #5 total is 25 pts and for a) it's 25 points and b) 20 points. Change total to 45 then?

yes, the total is 45. -pm

I add a term "total points" to the HW8 page. Is that fine? And I just upload my peer review for HW8, and submitted. But when I hit the "Update this peer review" button of HW7, HW5 expanded and HW7 will never expand. Is there a way to check I successfully submitted the review for HW8?

The pdf file I received only has one page in it. I think whoever this belongs to accidentally only uploaded one page of his/her homework. What should I do?

There is not much you can do beside grading that page only. -pm

For problem 4, using $ \mathcal{H}(\omega)=\frac{\mathcal{Y}(\omega)}{\mathcal{X}(\omega)} $, the answer is $ \mathcal{H}(\omega)=\omega_0 $. If the student did this and correctly computed the unit impulse response based on that result should I award (full) points?

No, this approach is not correct. This is because the output of the system is only specified for positive values of $ \omega $. The absolute value absolutely belongs to the answer. -pm

I could not check to make sure if I had summited toe peer review file. When I click the "Update this peer review" button under HW7, it only showed the previous peer review (HW6), content under HW7 was missing. Anyone have any idea of what went wrong?

Back to HW8

Back to ECE301 Spring 2011 Prof. Boutin