(New page: For number 3, is the point distribution supposed to be 10 points each for parts a b and c? And how should it be distributed for question 5?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Discussion for [[HW8_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|HW8]], [[ECE301]] Spring 2011, Prof. Boutin =
 +
 
For number 3, is the point distribution supposed to be 10 points each for parts a b and c? And how should it be distributed for question 5?
 
For number 3, is the point distribution supposed to be 10 points each for parts a b and c? And how should it be distributed for question 5?
 +
:Oops, I forgot there was part c) in Question 3. Please give 15 points for part c). I made the correction on the  [[HW8_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|homework page]]. I am not sure what is unclear about Question 5: can you be more precise? -pm
 +
 +
----
 +
[[HW8_ECE301_Spring2011_Prof_Boutin|Back to HW8]]
 +
 +
[[2011_Spring_ECE_301_Boutin|Back to ECE301 Spring 2011 Prof. Boutin]]

Revision as of 10:42, 21 March 2011

Discussion for HW8, ECE301 Spring 2011, Prof. Boutin

For number 3, is the point distribution supposed to be 10 points each for parts a b and c? And how should it be distributed for question 5?

Oops, I forgot there was part c) in Question 3. Please give 15 points for part c). I made the correction on the homework page. I am not sure what is unclear about Question 5: can you be more precise? -pm

Back to HW8

Back to ECE301 Spring 2011 Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood