(New page: Isn't this trivial? If G and H have the same shape, then their complements must have the same shape... I don't know a way to "show" it. --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't this trivial? If G and H have the same shape, then their complements must have the same shape... I don't know a way to "show" it. --[[User:Mkorb|Mkorb]] 18:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | Isn't this trivial? If G and H have the same shape, then their complements must have the same shape... I don't know a way to "show" it. --[[User:Mkorb|Mkorb]] 18:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ------------ | ||
| + | I think you need to actually construct a function that produces an isomorphism between the complement of G and the complement of H. Consider the function that does the "opposite" of the function that assigns the isomorphism from G to H. | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 12 November 2008
Isn't this trivial? If G and H have the same shape, then their complements must have the same shape... I don't know a way to "show" it. --Mkorb 18:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I think you need to actually construct a function that produces an isomorphism between the complement of G and the complement of H. Consider the function that does the "opposite" of the function that assigns the isomorphism from G to H.
