Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
You'll get an ugly integral evaluation but most terms cancel and it leaves you with 3 sine terms that then go into the fourier series.
 
You'll get an ugly integral evaluation but most terms cancel and it leaves you with 3 sine terms that then go into the fourier series.
 
  
 
Question, Page 547, Problem 15:
 
Question, Page 547, Problem 15:
Line 38: Line 37:
 
How do we show p_n?  I think I understand that this is part of calculating lambdas using the Sturm-Louiville, but I haven't been able to figure it out.
 
How do we show p_n?  I think I understand that this is part of calculating lambdas using the Sturm-Louiville, but I haven't been able to figure it out.
  
Answer:  The p_n come from the boundary conditions.  The problem is similar
+
Answer:  The p_n come from the boundary conditions.  (The problem is similar
to the Sturm-Liouville problem on Exam 2.
+
to the Sturm-Liouville problem on Exam 2.)  The boundary conitions are
  
 +
X(0)=0  and  X'(L)=0.
  
 
Question, Page 548, Problem 16:
 
Question, Page 548, Problem 16:
Line 47: Line 47:
  
 
Answer:  There is no f(x) in this problem.  (You can see that initial conditions
 
Answer:  There is no f(x) in this problem.  (You can see that initial conditions
are set in the next problem, which is a continuation of the whole thing.
+
are set in the next problem, which is a continuation of the whole thing.)
  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  

Revision as of 05:59, 28 November 2010

Homework 13 collaboration area

Question, Page 546, Problem 9:

Are the Boundary Conditions u(1/4,t) = 0 and u(3/4,t)=0 or u(0,t)=1/4 and u(L,t)=3/4? Also, can anyone help explain what f(x) is in this problem? I think g(x) = 0, but I'm not sure about f(x)?

Answer: Boundary Conditions: u(0,t) = 0, u(L,t) = 0. In this problem, L=1.

Initial Conditions: u(x,0)= f(x), which can be seen from the diagram as

f(x) = x - 1/4 for 1/4 < x < 1/2 and f(x) = -x + 3/4 for 1/2 < x < 3/4.

(Actually, the initial shape is supposed to be k=.01 times this, but that just puts the same k in front of the series for the solution.)

You'll have to split up the integral when calculating A_n. And yes, the last Initial Condition is

d(u)/dt(x,0) = g(x) = 0.

You'll get an ugly integral evaluation but most terms cancel and it leaves you with 3 sine terms that then go into the fourier series.

Question, Page 547, Problem 15:

How do we show that the constant is beta^4 without any boundary conditions to work with?

Answer. The beta to the fourth power is just a way to name the positive constant lambda to make the solutions easier to write. There will also be the cases lambda=0 and lambda negative (= minus beta to the fourth) to deal with. You won't use boundary conditions to eliminate solutions until problem 16.

Question, Page 552, Problem 5:

How do we show p_n? I think I understand that this is part of calculating lambdas using the Sturm-Louiville, but I haven't been able to figure it out.

Answer: The p_n come from the boundary conditions. (The problem is similar to the Sturm-Liouville problem on Exam 2.) The boundary conitions are

X(0)=0 and X'(L)=0.

Question, Page 548, Problem 16:

What about f(x) for this problem? I am really having a hard time identifying the f(x) for these problems. (Actually, this entire section in general) Does anybody know of a good reference for example problems?

Answer: There is no f(x) in this problem. (You can see that initial conditions are set in the next problem, which is a continuation of the whole thing.)

Back to the MA 527 start page

To Rhea Course List

Alumni Liaison

Prof. Math. Ohio State and Associate Dean
Outstanding Alumnus Purdue Math 2008

Jeff McNeal