(New page: Question 2. There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating. Suggestions?)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=[[Hw8ECE438F10|HW8]] Discussion, [[ECE438]], Fall 2010=
 
Question 2.
 
Question 2.
  
 
There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating.
 
There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating.
 
  
 
Suggestions?
 
Suggestions?
 +
:This is an excellent question, which makes me realize that I forgot to say the following in class: "Although the FFT makes the computation of a DFT faster on a computer, it does not make it faster for the DFT that we ask you to compute by hand. The idea is that, for N large, the number of operations needed to compute an FFT is much lower than that for computing a DFT using the formula. However, when we ask you to compute a DFT by hand, N is typically very small, so using the FFT usually only makes things more complicated. For answering Question 2, just use the definition of DFT (the summation formula) to compute it. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 21:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 +
----
 +
[[Hw8ECE438F10|Back to HW8]]
 +
[[2010 Fall ECE 438 Boutin|Back to ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin]]

Latest revision as of 16:20, 4 November 2010

HW8 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010

Question 2.

There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating.

Suggestions?

This is an excellent question, which makes me realize that I forgot to say the following in class: "Although the FFT makes the computation of a DFT faster on a computer, it does not make it faster for the DFT that we ask you to compute by hand. The idea is that, for N large, the number of operations needed to compute an FFT is much lower than that for computing a DFT using the formula. However, when we ask you to compute a DFT by hand, N is typically very small, so using the FFT usually only makes things more complicated. For answering Question 2, just use the definition of DFT (the summation formula) to compute it. --Mboutin 21:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Back to HW8 Back to ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood