Line 33: Line 33:
 
of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)
 
of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)
  
* Another way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of 1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]].....therefore greatly simplifying the solution (no trig identities required).   
+
* Another way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of
 +
 
 +
1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]]
 +
 
 +
...therefore greatly simplifying the solution (no trig identities required).
 +
 
 +
(You'll need to use the formula
 +
 
 +
L[ t f(t) ] = -F'(s)
 +
 
 +
to get the inverse transform.)  
  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  
 
[[2010 MA 527 Bell|Back to the MA 527 start page]]  

Revision as of 14:20, 18 October 2010

Homework 8 Collaboration Area

Question on problem 15 in Sec 6.6.

I tried to obtain the expression for

s/(s + 1) * 1/(s+1)

but am not getting the correct result in the Laplace table of

t sin t.

I am using the convolution of cos(tau)*sin(t-tau). There is no t term in sight. Is it okay to read off the table? Even if it is, shouldn't the result be the same?

Answer:

To find the inverse Laplace transform of

s/(s + 1) * 1/(s+1)

you'll need to compute the convolution integral:

$ \int_0^t \cos(\tau)\sin(t-\tau)\ d\tau. $

You'll have to use a formula for the sine of the difference of two angles and be very careful. Remember, t acts like a constant in the integrals.

There is only one correct answer, so you should get it that way. (If it looks different than the back of the book, a trig identity might be at fault.)

  • Another way to solve this problem is to recognize that the given expression is the derivative of

1 / [(s+2)^2 + 1]]

...therefore greatly simplifying the solution (no trig identities required).

(You'll need to use the formula

L[ t f(t) ] = -F'(s)

to get the inverse transform.)

Back to the MA 527 start page

To Rhea Course List

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn