| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)? | For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)? | ||
| − | + | ::Sort of. but this is a "convoluted" way to get the answer (pun intended). Think about it a little bit! --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 07:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | |
| + | ---- | ||
[[Hw5ECE438F10|Back to HW5]] | [[Hw5ECE438F10|Back to HW5]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 29 September 2010
HW5 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin
Use this page to discuss the homework. Feel free to post your answers and discuss them here. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Any hints on how to start off 1b?
- Look at the reconstruction in the Fourier domain. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand what 2a) wants. Reconstruction signal?> Is that ... inverse sampling it? ~ajfunche
For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)?
- Sort of. but this is a "convoluted" way to get the answer (pun intended). Think about it a little bit! --Mboutin 07:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
