| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Siddharth Tekriwal: | Siddharth Tekriwal: | ||
| − | You can try to approach the problem in a different way. Lets say x and y converge to L. Show that for some n>a, abs(x-L)<e and n>b, abs(y-L)<e. Then show that there exists some c for which, n>c, abs(z-L)<e! | + | You can try to approach the problem in a different way. Lets say x and y converge to L. Show that for some n>a, abs(x-L)<e and n>b, abs(y-L)<e. Then show that there exists some c for which, n>c, abs(z-L)<e! |
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 10 March 2010
To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.
To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...
go back to the Discussion Page
In #5, I'm having trouble figuring out how to prove that sequence $ Z $ is bounded in order to use Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem and Theorem 3.4.9 to prove the necessary and sufficient conditions. I know that since both sequences $ X $ and $ Y $ are convergent that they are bounded, but I can't quite figure out how to use this information to prove that $ Z $ is bounded.
-- Siddharth Tekriwal:
You can try to approach the problem in a different way. Lets say x and y converge to L. Show that for some n>a, abs(x-L)<e and n>b, abs(y-L)<e. Then show that there exists some c for which, n>c, abs(z-L)<e!
In #3, what will be a good starting point? I am having difficulty proceeding through the problem.
--Rrichmo 20:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
What I did was write out the sequence (Xn) to notice that (Xn+1) (the next element in the sequence) is equal to 1 + 1/Xn (this was not intuitive to me). Knowing that both (Xn) and (Xn+1) equal the same limit you can set them equal to each other like in example 3.4.3, then solve.
More detail about this solution method can also be found at http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/prime/articles/fibonac/index.asp
M.N.
