Line 12: Line 12:
 
<math> \therefore g_k = \left ( \frac {1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) \right) + \left( \frac {-1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) (-1)^k \right) </math>
 
<math> \therefore g_k = \left ( \frac {1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) \right) + \left( \frac {-1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) (-1)^k \right) </math>
  
<math> But we had taken the derivative of z(t) to get g(t) (and hence g_k).
+
But we had taken the derivative of z(t) to get g(t) (and hence <math> g_k </math>).
\therefore z_k = \left ( \frac{g_k}{jk\omega_o} \right ) </math>
+
<math> \therefore z_k = \left ( \frac{g_k}{jk\omega_o} \right ) </math>

Revision as of 11:26, 1 July 2008

7b Old Kiwi.jpg

Let $ g(t) = \left ( \frac{dz}{dt} \right ) $

7b1 Old Kiwi.jpg 7b2 Old Kiwi.jpg

Therefore, $ m_k = \left ( \frac {1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) \right) , n_k = \left( \frac {-1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) e^\frac{-j2k\pi2}{4} \right) $

But $ g_k = m_k + n_k = \left ( \frac {1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) \right) + \left( \frac {-1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) e^\frac{-j2k\pi2}{4} \right) $

$ \therefore g_k = \left ( \frac {1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) \right) + \left( \frac {-1}{k\pi} \sin ( \frac {k\pi}{2} ) (-1)^k \right) $

But we had taken the derivative of z(t) to get g(t) (and hence $ g_k $). $ \therefore z_k = \left ( \frac{g_k}{jk\omega_o} \right ) $

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood