m (Group moved to Group Theory)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
#Inverse: <math>\forall a\in G</math>    <math>\exists a^{-1}\in G</math> such that <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = e</math>
 
#Inverse: <math>\forall a\in G</math>    <math>\exists a^{-1}\in G</math> such that <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = e</math>
  
== Notation ==
+
== Notation, Terminology, and Notes ==
 
Groups written additively use + to denote their [[Binary Operation_Old Kiwi]], 0 to denote their identity, <math>-a</math> to denote the inverse of element <math>a</math>, and <math>na</math> to denote <math>a + a + \ldots + a</math> (<math>n</math> terms).
 
Groups written additively use + to denote their [[Binary Operation_Old Kiwi]], 0 to denote their identity, <math>-a</math> to denote the inverse of element <math>a</math>, and <math>na</math> to denote <math>a + a + \ldots + a</math> (<math>n</math> terms).
  
 
Groups written multiplicatively use <math>\cdot</math> or juxtaposition to denote their [[Binary Operation_Old Kiwi]], 1 to denote their identity, <math>a^{-1}</math> to denote the inverse of element <math>a</math>, and <math>a^n</math> to denote <math>a \cdot a \cdot \ldots \cdot a</math> (<math>n</math> terms).
 
Groups written multiplicatively use <math>\cdot</math> or juxtaposition to denote their [[Binary Operation_Old Kiwi]], 1 to denote their identity, <math>a^{-1}</math> to denote the inverse of element <math>a</math>, and <math>a^n</math> to denote <math>a \cdot a \cdot \ldots \cdot a</math> (<math>n</math> terms).
 +
 +
A right-sided definition is also possible where the element is postmultiplied rather than premultiplied by the identity and inverse in the group axioms.  The first two theorems below can be proved in an analogous way for a right-sided definition so the definitions are equivalent.
  
 
== Theorems ==
 
== Theorems ==

Revision as of 16:21, 17 May 2008

Definition (left-sided)

A group $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ is a set G and a Binary Operation_Old Kiwi $ \cdot $ on G (closed over G by definition) such that the group axioms hold:

  1. Associativity: $ a\cdot(b\cdot c) = (a\cdot b)\cdot c $ $ \forall a,b,c \in G $
  2. Identity: $ \exists e\in G $ such that $ e\cdot a = a $ $ \forall a \in G $
  3. Inverse: $ \forall a\in G $ $ \exists a^{-1}\in G $ such that $ a^{-1}\cdot a = e $

Notation, Terminology, and Notes

Groups written additively use + to denote their Binary Operation_Old Kiwi, 0 to denote their identity, $ -a $ to denote the inverse of element $ a $, and $ na $ to denote $ a + a + \ldots + a $ ($ n $ terms).

Groups written multiplicatively use $ \cdot $ or juxtaposition to denote their Binary Operation_Old Kiwi, 1 to denote their identity, $ a^{-1} $ to denote the inverse of element $ a $, and $ a^n $ to denote $ a \cdot a \cdot \ldots \cdot a $ ($ n $ terms).

A right-sided definition is also possible where the element is postmultiplied rather than premultiplied by the identity and inverse in the group axioms. The first two theorems below can be proved in an analogous way for a right-sided definition so the definitions are equivalent.

Theorems

Element commutes with inverse

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then $ \forall a\in G $ $ a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $

Prf: Let $ a $ be an arbitrary element of $ G $. Since $ a^{-1}\in G $, it has an inverse $ (a^{-1})^{-1} $ in $ G $ such that $ (a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1} = 1 $ by the inverse axiom. But $ 1\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1} $ by the identity axiom, so substituting into the previous equation: $ (a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot (1\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $. But by the inverse axiom, $ 1 = a^{-1}\cdot a $, so substituting again: $ (a^{-1})^{-1}((a^{-1}\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $ and by associativity $ ((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1})\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $. But $ ((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $ and $ 1\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = a\cdot a^{-1} $, so $ a\cdot a^{-1} = 1 $. Since $ a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $ is given by the inverse axiom, $ a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $.

Identity commutes with all elements

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then $ \forall a\in G $ $ a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a $

Prf: $ 1\cdot a = a $ by the identity axiom, but $ 1 = a\cdot a^{-1} $ by the previous theorem. Substituting: $ (a\cdot a^{-1})\cdot a = a $ and by associativity $ a\cdot(a^{-1}\cdot a) = a $. By the inverse axiom $ a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $, so substituting again $ a\cdot 1 = a $. Thus $ a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a $.

Identity is unique

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then its identity element is unique.

Prf: Suppose $ 1_a $ and $ 1_b $ are both identity elements of $ G $. Then because $ 1_a $ is an identity, by the identity axiom $ 1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_b $. But because $ 1_b $ is an identity, by the above theorem $ 1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_a $. Thus $ 1_a = 1_b $.

Each element has a unique inverse

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group and $ a $ be an arbitrary element of $ G $. Then the inverse element of $ a $ is unique.

Prf: Suppose $ a^{-1}_1 $ and $ a^{-1}_2 $ are both inverses of $ a $. Then by the inverse axiom $ a^{-1}_1\cdot a = 1 $ and $ a^{-1}_2\cdot a = 1 $. Thus $ a^{-1}_1\cdot a = a^{-1}_2\cdot a $. Let $ a^{-1} $ be an arbitrary inverse of $ a $ and postmultiply both sides by it. Then $ (a^{-1}_1\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1} = (a^{-1}_2\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1} $ and by associativity $ a^{-1}_1\cdot (a\cdot a^{-1}) = a^{-1}_2\cdot (a\cdot a^{-1}) $. But because each element commutes with its inverse and by the inverse axiom $ a\cdot a^{-1} = 1 $ so $ a^{-1}_1\cdot 1 = a^{-1}_2\cdot 1 $. Because the identity commutes with all elements and by the identity axiom $ a^{-1}_1 = a^{-1}_2 $.

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn