Line 1: Line 1:
I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values.
+
*I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values.--[[User:Jwromine|Jwromine]] 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
--[[User:Jwromine|Jwromine]] 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
+
  
Since we did LPC in the lab without going over the details of solutions in class, I would prefer to learn the math behind the two methods before doing it in lab.
+
*Since we did LPC in the lab without going over the details of solutions in class, I would prefer to learn the math behind the two methods before doing it in lab.
 +
 
 +
* How about less review of ECE301 and ECE302 material so we can do more speech/sound/image processing instead? --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 16:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:08, 28 April 2009

  • I would suggest that in the future more test problems be broken up into parts (a,b,c, etc). That way, it may be possible to demonstrate understanding of part of a topic and receive part of the credit. I understand that partial credit is given on long problems, but I feel that this credit would be more fairly distributed if certain parts of the problem were assigned different point values.--Jwromine 23:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Since we did LPC in the lab without going over the details of solutions in class, I would prefer to learn the math behind the two methods before doing it in lab.
  • How about less review of ECE301 and ECE302 material so we can do more speech/sound/image processing instead? --Mboutin 16:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood