(New page: I got (1 - 2x) as the multiplicitave inverse, since that multiplied by (2x + 1) is 1. --~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I got (1 - 2x) as the multiplicitave inverse, since that multiplied by (2x + 1) is 1.
+
I got (1 - 2x) as the multiplicitave inverse, since that multiplied by (2x + 1) is 1. ... which i guess is the same as the original function.
 
--[[User:Jcromer|Jcromer]] 20:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Jcromer|Jcromer]] 20:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 1 April 2009

I got (1 - 2x) as the multiplicitave inverse, since that multiplied by (2x + 1) is 1. ... which i guess is the same as the original function. --Jcromer 20:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Sees the importance of signal filtering in medical imaging

Dhruv Lamba, BSEE2010