(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
--[[User:Jberlako|Jberlako]] 22:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Jberlako|Jberlako]] 22:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 
I'm so lost. Is this question "How many bit strings are there of length six or less?"? It's in section 5.1 of my book for some reason!
 
  
  
Line 33: Line 31:
 
If you increase the problem to numbers less than 5000, you include one more integer that is a square and cube, namely 4096.
 
If you increase the problem to numbers less than 5000, you include one more integer that is a square and cube, namely 4096.
  
<math>sqrt[5]{5000}=5.49</math>
+
<math>\sqrt[5]{5000}=5.49</math>
<math>sqrt[6]{5000}=4.13</math>
+
 
 +
<math>\sqrt[6]{5000}=4.13</math>
  
 
This shows that the sixth root is correct. I think I understand what is going on here now. If you have a number that has both a square and cube root it must be the result of the cube of a square or the square of a cube. Look at the 4 numbers we have in the intersection of the sets for this problem
 
This shows that the sixth root is correct. I think I understand what is going on here now. If you have a number that has both a square and cube root it must be the result of the cube of a square or the square of a cube. Look at the 4 numbers we have in the intersection of the sets for this problem

Latest revision as of 09:49, 22 January 2009


So, you will need to go a little further with explanations of why but the way to go about this one is:

$ \lfloor \sqrt{1000} \rfloor + \lfloor \sqrt[3]{1000} \rfloor - \lfloor \sqrt[6]{1000} \rfloor $

To see why this is correct, draw a Venn Diagram, and take out the common terms.


I didn't think of the 6th root approach, so i just when through and counted the cubes (since there would only be 10) and I found that only 1 and 64 are both squares and cubes.


You missed one. 729 is both a square and a cube. I believe the correct equation would be;

$ \lfloor \sqrt{1000} \rfloor + \lfloor \sqrt[3]{1000} \rfloor - \lfloor \sqrt[5]{1000} \rfloor $

This yields the same answer, but I believe the intersection is the set $ x^2*x^3=x^5 $ meaning you would need the 5th root, not the sixth.

--Jberlako 21:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I have been playing around with this one, and the original equation is right, but I can't figure out why. Can you explain why it is the 6th root rather than the 5th?

--Jberlako 22:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


I guess I don't get why you say the original equation is correct, I thought the second one looked right.

--Rhollowe 00:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

If you increase the problem to numbers less than 5000, you include one more integer that is a square and cube, namely 4096.

$ \sqrt[5]{5000}=5.49 $

$ \sqrt[6]{5000}=4.13 $

This shows that the sixth root is correct. I think I understand what is going on here now. If you have a number that has both a square and cube root it must be the result of the cube of a square or the square of a cube. Look at the 4 numbers we have in the intersection of the sets for this problem

$ 1=(1^2)^3 $

$ 64=4^3=8^2 $ where $ 4=2^2 $ and $ 8=2^3 $ meaning $ 64=(2^2)^3 $

$ 729=27^2=9^3 $ where $ 27=3^3 $ and $ 9=3^2 $ meaning $ 729=(3^2)^3 $

$ 4096=16^3=64^2 $ where $ 16=4^2 $ and $ 64=4^3 $ meaning $ 4096=(4^2)^3 $

As we all know, $ (x^a)^b=x^{b*a} $ which in our case gives us $ x^6 $.

--Jberlako 11:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva