(New page: I know that the solution to this problem is in the back of the book, but I still can't quite follow the logic. What would the proper inductive step look like?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know that the solution to this problem is in the back of the book, but I still can't quite follow the logic. What would the proper inductive step look like? | I know that the solution to this problem is in the back of the book, but I still can't quite follow the logic. What would the proper inductive step look like? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | - well from my understanding, I believe that there would be no way to come up with a correct inductive step since the original statement is false. --Kim | ||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 21 January 2009
I know that the solution to this problem is in the back of the book, but I still can't quite follow the logic. What would the proper inductive step look like?
- well from my understanding, I believe that there would be no way to come up with a correct inductive step since the original statement is false. --Kim
