(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
This equation is derived through the property that if <math>x_1</math> is smaller than <math>x_2</math> then <math>x_1</math> will be equal to Y and vise-versa
 
This equation is derived through the property that if <math>x_1</math> is smaller than <math>x_2</math> then <math>x_1</math> will be equal to Y and vise-versa
  
I don't really see how the limit is f(x2) and you are also integrating on f(x2)
+
 
 +
I don't really see how the limit is f(x2) and you are also integrating on f(x2). Although I do agree the problem bears
 +
resemblance to hw 1, where we had to find the max of (x,y). Only in this case, it is an exponential random variable and you are
 +
finding the min. //Anand

Latest revision as of 15:27, 6 October 2008

Starting this problem is similar to question 3 in homework 1.

$ Y = min(x_1, x_2) $

$ f(x_1) = c_1\cdot e^{-c_1x1} $

$ f(x_2) = c_2\cdot e^{-c_2x2} $

From here we can use properties of integration to expand our min function into integrals.

$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 min(x_1, x_2) $

I believe we can set the bounds from 0 to 1 since probabilities can not exceed this range.

$ \int_0^1 \int_0^{f(x_2)} f(x_1) dx_1 dx_2 + \int_0^1 \int_{f(x_2)}^1 f(x_2) dx_1 dx_2 $

This equation is derived through the property that if $ x_1 $ is smaller than $ x_2 $ then $ x_1 $ will be equal to Y and vise-versa


I don't really see how the limit is f(x2) and you are also integrating on f(x2). Although I do agree the problem bears resemblance to hw 1, where we had to find the max of (x,y). Only in this case, it is an exponential random variable and you are finding the min. //Anand

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva