(New page: You're definitions are very good, except a system is considered to have memory when its current output is dependent on future values of the input and output also. - Christen Juzeszyn) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
You're definitions are very good, except a system is considered to have memory when its current output is dependent on future values of the input and output also. | You're definitions are very good, except a system is considered to have memory when its current output is dependent on future values of the input and output also. | ||
- Christen Juzeszyn | - Christen Juzeszyn | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Correct, clear to me. - Ronny Wijaya | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | These definitions are both correct and simple to understand. I might change the wording "It doesn't take in..." to say, "It doesn't depend on...", but this is simply a matter of personal preference to wording then anything that is really incorrect. As mentioned above, you did forget to mention that a system with memory depends on the future as well as the past. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Zachary Curosh | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Like Christen I also noticed that you did not mention the fact that, for a system with memory the ouput y(t) depends on both past and FUTURE values of inputs. | ||
| + | Also i just wanted to point out the fact that the term (t-1) represents a time "t" in the future not the past. :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Vivek Ravi | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Definitions are clear and correct, however the wording can probably be changed to sound more precise/formal. For example you could phrases similar to , "There exist some input such that...." or "For any input..." | ||
Latest revision as of 13:29, 19 September 2008
You're definitions are very good, except a system is considered to have memory when its current output is dependent on future values of the input and output also. - Christen Juzeszyn
Correct, clear to me. - Ronny Wijaya
These definitions are both correct and simple to understand. I might change the wording "It doesn't take in..." to say, "It doesn't depend on...", but this is simply a matter of personal preference to wording then anything that is really incorrect. As mentioned above, you did forget to mention that a system with memory depends on the future as well as the past.
-Zachary Curosh
Like Christen I also noticed that you did not mention the fact that, for a system with memory the ouput y(t) depends on both past and FUTURE values of inputs. Also i just wanted to point out the fact that the term (t-1) represents a time "t" in the future not the past. :)
Vivek Ravi
Definitions are clear and correct, however the wording can probably be changed to sound more precise/formal. For example you could phrases similar to , "There exist some input such that...." or "For any input..."
