- 15:26, 10 March 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+134) . . Ch. 12 - Problem 2
- 14:26, 25 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+38) . . Question 3 from file
- 14:25, 25 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+206) . . Question 3 from file
- 08:02, 22 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+159) . . Question 3 from file
- 19:34, 18 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+1) . . Question about second part? (current)
- 19:33, 18 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+74) . . Question about second part?
- 12:33, 14 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+229) . . N Question about second part? (New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther For the part where we have to exhibit an element that has the property, how do you know what to start with? I wasn't clear about it. --~~~~)
- 12:32, 14 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+33) . . Chapter 6: Problem 35
- 09:02, 1 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+196) . . N Question about Chapter 3, Problem 4 (New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther So is g^k the element for the group? Just trying to see how g^k gives us the answer for any element. --~~~~)
- 09:00, 1 February 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+41) . . Chapter 3: Problem 4
- 12:45, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+92) . . W
- 12:33, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+189) . . N W (New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther Do we need to use the matrices and the sine function proof for the solution to this problem? --~~~~)
- 12:30, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . Chapter 1 6
- 12:28, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+25) . . Chapter 1 6
- 12:24, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (-287) . . Talk:Chapter 1 6 (Removing all content from page) (current)
- 12:23, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+65) . . Talk:Chapter 1 6 (→Chapter 1 6 Question: new section)
- 12:20, 25 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+222) . . N Talk:Chapter 1 6 (New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther So is it necessary to use the matrix and the idea of sin in order to do this problem? Or is there another way to go about it? --~~~~)
- 06:36, 19 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+420) . . N Josh Rendall's Favorite Theorem (New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther I would have to say my favorite theorem is the Squeeze Theorem. It states that if g(x) <= f(x) <= h(x) and the limit of both g(x) and h(x) as x approac...) (current)
- 06:09, 19 January 2009 (diff | hist) . . (+37) . . MA 453 Spring 2009 Walther Week 1
