HW8 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010

Question 2.

There has to be a decent way to do this by hand. Computing 2 3pt DFTs and then 3 2 pt DFTs is really irritating.

Suggestions?

This is an excellent question, which makes me realize that I forgot to say the following in class: "Although the FFT makes the computation of a DFT faster on a computer, it does not make it faster for the DFT that we ask you to compute by hand. The idea is that, for N large, the number of operations needed to compute an FFT is much lower than that for computing a DFT using the formula. However, when we ask you to compute a DFT by hand, N is typically very small, so using the FFT usually only makes things more complicated. For answering Question 2, just use the definition of DFT (the summation formula) to compute it. --Mboutin 21:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Back to HW8 Back to ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva